Part 3 on Behaviorist Theory - Skinner and
Watson:
Behaviorist theory examines how environment, conditioning,
rewards, and consequences shape development. Rather than internal thoughts and
feelings, behaviorists focus on external behaviors we can observe and measure
scientifically. The two pioneers of behaviorist child psychology are John
Watson and B.F. Skinner. Their principles transformed our understanding of how
positive and negative reinforcements mold children's conduct.
John Watson: Conditioned Responses John Watson is
considered the father of behaviorism. He rejected analyzing internal mental
processes as too subjective. Watson believed all human behavior is a
conditioned response shaped by external events. Even emotions are considered
conditioned reactions.
In his famous Little Albert experiment, Watson conditioned
an infant to fear a white rat by pairing it with a frightening loud sound. The
fear generalized to other furry objects, demonstrating how new responses can be
learned through association.
Watson extended his ideas about conditioning to
child-rearing. He advised strictly conditioning children by rewarding desired
behaviors and punishing unwanted ones. Showing minimal affection prevents
spoiling. He believed any child could be shaped into a desired type of person
using behaviorist principles.
While Watson’s perspective seems rigid today, he pioneered
the scientific view that nurture shapes children’s development through
environmental interaction. His theories launched the behaviorist tradition.
B.F. Skinner: Operant Conditioning Building on Watson’s
work, B.F. Skinner further refined behaviorist theories through his principles
of operant conditioning. He identified four types of reinforcement:
Positive Reinforcement: When a behavior is rewarded, it
increases in frequency. For example, praising helpful chores makes children
more likely to keep helping.
Negative Reinforcement: Removing an unpleasant stimulus
following a behavior encourages its repetition. For instance, buckling a
screaming toddler into their car seat makes the noise stop.
Positive Punishment: Adding an unwanted stimulus or
consequence after a behavior reduces its occurrence. Example: Giving a time-out
when rules are broken.
Negative Punishment: Taking away a pleasurable stimulus
reduces a behavior. For example, losing phone privileges for rude language.
Skinner believed using reinforcement effectively is the key
to shaping behavior. Punishment should be avoided when possible, as it can
cause resentment or retaliation. Providing natural rewards and consequences
consistently works best.
Skinner rejected Watson’s cold conditioning. He said
reinforcement must consider each child's needs and motives. However, like
Watson, Skinner cautioned against too much affection which reduces children’s
ability to self-regulate.
Parents can implement Skinner’s principles by identifying
target behaviors and considering effective reinforcements tailored to the
child’s temperament. Providing rewards contingently reinforces positive
conduct. Minimizing attention and stimuli for unwanted behaviors can reduce
them without confrontation. Clear communication of expectations is essential.
Critics argue that behaviorism neglects innate personality
differences and cognitive factors in learning. However, operant conditioning
offers scientifically-sound techniques for shaping children's conduct through
creative rewards and constructive discipline. Tracking progress often yields
positive results.
While later theories delve into internal processes more
deeply, behaviorism provides the seminal account of how external reinforcement
molds development. Implementing operant conditioning thoughtfully can teach
children positive skills and behaviors to last a lifetime. Watson and Skinner’s
groundbreaking work established parenting practices still used effectively
today.
No comments:
Post a Comment